Google Chrome 3: New and Improved (Really)

Google's Chrome web Browser has now been available for just over a year, and people all over have been discovering its power and simplicity. If you've been waiting for it to mature a bit, or if you haven't given it any thought...now is the time to act.

Today Google has made Chrome version 3 available to the masses. This, of course, doesn't count the Chrome 3 betas that have already been available to software/internet geeks.

Since the update was waiting for me when I opened Chrome this morning, I gave it a spin to test out the new features they've added. I'm very pleased with the speed of navigation and page rendering/loading. Please keep in mind that I'm not a top-notch geek, so the following is by no means a comprehensive list of the new feature set.

Improved Performance

One of the things that most impresses me is that Chrome 3 uses HTML 5 as a standard. To me and the rest of you average end users out there, this means you're going to see all that embedded media without plugins like a Flash player, because the HTML 5 protocol automagically takes care of rendering dynamic content.

The Look

Many of us love shiny, pretty things. Chrome 3 has finally given us some of that visual swag. The default theme itself is wearing a new slick gradient skin and the navigation icons seem to pop a bit more. Now, however, you're not going to be "stuck" with the default theme if it starts to bore you. They've given us some very cool and colorful themes to tart up the browser a bit.

Fastest Yet

I definitely see an increase in speed, and so will you. Not just in navigation time, but in page-load terms as well. Even if you have multiple tabs open...doesn't matter. Chrome 3 is beating the pants off my Firefox right now.

As I said above, there are more improvements in Google Chrome version 3 than what I've mentioned. If you want to see the full story, head over to the Official Google Blog.

Read more...

Google Chrome Doesn't Replace My Mozilla Firefox; We'll Call it a Tie

Last year, I all but ditched Windows Internet Explorer for Mozilla Firefox (and the recent release of IE 8 has not made me reconsider). Being very happy with Firefox, I restrained myself from really investigating Google Chrome, though I kept informed on prevailing opinions in the tech community since before the Chrome Beta was released last autumn.

A few weeks ago, I decided the time was ripe to give Google Chrome a shot. I'm glad I did, because after putting it through my paces, I'm very impressed.

One of the most obvious (and now, recognizable) features of Chrome is the user interface. Clean and minimalistic icons, tabs, and integrated search/address bar make it very friendly to use. And this is coming from a guy who appreciates a bit of decoration, color, and lots of customization options. Speed and stability are two other areas where Google Chrome shines, which isn't surprising, since it's based on parts of Apple's Webkit (ask any Mac Geek what makes the Safari browser so awesome).

I won't give any more than this, so you'll just have to try Chrome for yourself. Download and installation is a breeze, and with a short learning curve, you'll be up and running pretty swiftly.

And no, I will not be ditching Mozilla's Firefox. I've already learned to work with both of them, usually in tandem.

Read more...

Google Chrome Browser Lands Yesterday; Stirs User Content Concerns Today

So Yesterday (Tuesday, September 2) Google's entry into the Browser wars, Google Chrome (beta) became available to the masses. It boasts several slick features; a simple user interface, speedy load times, tabs that can be dragged into another window, combining open browser windows, the list goes on. It's obvious this is Google's Gauntlet, thrown down before Windows Internet Explorer, Safari, Opera, Firefox, etc...especially since some of Chrome's coolest features are "inspired" by similar elements of those other browsers. For a rundown on that, take a look at this Gizmodo Post. Seems that Google now has (another) great application in their already impressive arsenal of services. Maybe they are bent on world domination, or maybe they're just trying to offer end users more choices in the world of tech. It's just a question of your viewpoint (potayto, potahto). I don't have any need or desire to try it out myself, since I've already fallen in love with Mozilla Firefox 3 and still have Internet Explorer 7 installed, though rarely used in the last few weeks, mostly as a backup to be used in the event my Firefox has some sort of unthinkable epic fail situation.

Today, however, all is not calm. Some eagle-eyed end user spotted "suspicious" wording in the Google Chrome EULA (End User License Agreement), which, at first glance, raises questions about content ownership. If you want to click over to Gizmodo's news item on the Google Chrome EULA, where I spotted it, you'll see that it certainly throws a shadow on user privacy/content issues. Also, you can see that there is a discussion going on in the comments section of that Gizmodo article. I'm sure there are similar discussions going on wherever this topic has been posted.
I'm not fluent in legalese, but it can hardly be said that Google Chrome is the only place you find such ominous-sounding Terms of Service. After looking at the relevant section on the Chrome EULA posted in the Gizmodo story, and revisiting the terms of service of this very Blogger account, it's very similar.

Here is my understanding of the whole "sordid" issue. There's not a whole lot to worry about in terms of content ownership or intellectual property. In these terms of service, which we can understand as being the same across the range of Google services and applications, Google states that they lay NO claim to content ownership. They DO state that your entry into the agreement allows them to use portions of a user's content FOR PURPOSES OF ADVERTISING GOOGLE SERVICES.
Now, I'm not going to slam Gizmodo (or any other site that is running this news item), but I gotta admit, it seems just a bit alarmist to me. And there is certainly no harm in discussing these issues, since I think it's a good way for we, the users to keep them, the providers "honest." In the end, it comes down to all of us using our common sense and understanding of the give-and-take that is inherent in information technology.

UPDATE: In the spirit of the paragraph directly above, Google has already responded to the concerns being aired in the blogosphere, assuring everyone that the language in the EULA will be changed, and also made retroactive for users who have already downloaded Google Chrome.

Coming Soon: The Entertainment Value of "Fanboy Wars" (like Apple vs. Microsoft), Lots of Love for Paint.Net Freeware, More Smartphone Goodness

Read more...