Search This Blog

Showing posts with label User Content. Show all posts
Showing posts with label User Content. Show all posts

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Google Buzz: Is There Really No Room For It?

The recent launch of Google Buzz has created quite a hoopla. Within days the usage of the service skyrocketed, and many websites (especially those focused on social networking) had implemented Google Buzz "share buttons" alongside the now-familiar Facebook and Twitter buttons. The main focus of many Google Buzz-related posts on these and other blogs has been the question, "How useful is Google Buzz in light of the services most of us already use?" It's a question mirrored and discussed by readers of these sites, and anyone else who has a Gmail account. I'm one of the countless people who have been pondering this question, and I'm going to address it now.

I have a Twitter page and a Facebook profile, I share via StumbleUpon, MyLikes, Gdgt, and several other Social Bookmarking/sharing sites. But I also use several Google services, like Gmail, Google Docs, Google Calendar, etc. I could take up the reasoning of those who say, "Aargh! I don't need one more social bookmarking service...I'm not using it." This has the tone of a child petulantly exclaiming, "I'm taking my marbles and going home!" But I'm asking, "Why not?" From my position, what's the big deal with utilizing a service that's already integrated with my Gmail, and connects easily to my Google Reader, and even this very Blogger site? Not that I've actually gotten around to hooking it up yet, but that's a different issue.

It seems to me there's a sense of disappointment that Google didn't come up with Google Buzz earlier in the social bookmarking game, which somehow gets translated (albeit poorly) into viewing the service as less than useful. The fact that the user-adoption of Google Buzz has quickly grown kind of makes that a moot point, in my opinion. If it's really not very useful, someone needs to send the memo to all the people who decided to give it a try, and who apparently enjoy using it.

Maybe you're one of the folks who balked at how Google Buzz launched with its privacy control missing, which allowed your followers to see your Gmail address, and addresses of others you're connected to. Okay, but they've fixed that. Now the only people you're connected to on Google Buzz who can see your Gmail address are the ones who already know it.

Another good reason to get your Google Buzz rolling is visibility (for those of you who like to maintain it and even increase it). There are undoubtedly a few people in your Gmail contacts list who aren't on Twitter or even Facebook. Share with them. For anyone with an interest in using Search Engine Optimization to develop your web presence, adding Google Buzz to your arsenal can only be a plus.

The only other issue I see right now is for the folks who have a Google Profile and/or use Google Reader and wish to disable Google Buzz, since it's opt-in by default. Currently, killing your Google Buzz means deleting your Google Profile and Google Reader. I can see how that would be adding insult to injury, and Google should make it possible to disable Google Buzz without affecting your other Google services.

In the end, you're going to do what you want. I just think that anyone with more than marginal interest in Internet and communication should at least be giving Google Buzz a solid try before dismissing it.

For those who don't have a Gmail account and/or aren't familiar with Google Buzz, here's a helpful info page over at Google.

Read more...

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Google Chrome Browser Lands Yesterday; Stirs User Content Concerns Today



So Yesterday (Tuesday, September 2) Google's entry into the Browser wars, Google Chrome (beta) became available to the masses. It boasts several slick features; a simple user interface, speedy load times, tabs that can be dragged into another window, combining open browser windows, the list goes on. It's obvious this is Google's Gauntlet, thrown down before Windows Internet Explorer, Safari, Opera, Firefox, etc...especially since some of Chrome's coolest features are "inspired" by similar elements of those other browsers. For a rundown on that, take a look at this Gizmodo Post. Seems that Google now has (another) great application in their already impressive arsenal of services. Maybe they are bent on world domination, or maybe they're just trying to offer end users more choices in the world of tech. It's just a question of your viewpoint (potayto, potahto). I don't have any need or desire to try it out myself, since I've already fallen in love with Mozilla Firefox 3 and still have Internet Explorer 7 installed, though rarely used in the last few weeks, mostly as a backup to be used in the event my Firefox has some sort of unthinkable epic fail situation.

Today, however, all is not calm. Some eagle-eyed end user spotted "suspicious" wording in the Google Chrome EULA (End User License Agreement), which, at first glance, raises questions about content ownership. If you want to click over to Gizmodo's news item on the Google Chrome EULA, where I spotted it, you'll see that it certainly throws a shadow on user privacy/content issues. Also, you can see that there is a discussion going on in the comments section of that Gizmodo article. I'm sure there are similar discussions going on wherever this topic has been posted.
I'm not fluent in legalese, but it can hardly be said that Google Chrome is the only place you find such ominous-sounding Terms of Service. After looking at the relevant section on the Chrome EULA posted in the Gizmodo story, and revisiting the terms of service of this very Blogger account, it's very similar.

Here is my understanding of the whole "sordid" issue. There's not a whole lot to worry about in terms of content ownership or intellectual property. In these terms of service, which we can understand as being the same across the range of Google services and applications, Google states that they lay NO claim to content ownership. They DO state that your entry into the agreement allows them to use portions of a user's content FOR PURPOSES OF ADVERTISING GOOGLE SERVICES.
Now, I'm not going to slam Gizmodo (or any other site that is running this news item), but I gotta admit, it seems just a bit alarmist to me. And there is certainly no harm in discussing these issues, since I think it's a good way for we, the users to keep them, the providers "honest." In the end, it comes down to all of us using our common sense and understanding of the give-and-take that is inherent in information technology.

UPDATE: In the spirit of the paragraph directly above, Google has already responded to the concerns being aired in the blogosphere, assuring everyone that the language in the EULA will be changed, and also made retroactive for users who have already downloaded Google Chrome.

Coming Soon: The Entertainment Value of "Fanboy Wars" (like Apple vs. Microsoft), Lots of Love for Paint.Net Freeware, More Smartphone Goodness

Read more...

  © Blogger template Starry by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP